Many young people change their jobs and careers. What are the reasons for this? Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
In recent times, courtesy of the erratic changes of society, job acquisition is of fundamental importance for people to catch up with those constant developments. Additionally, it is glaringly apparent that this phenomenon is exceptionally prevailing among young employees, which can be justified for a host of reasons. In this essay, the causes leading to this notion will be elucidated before drawing any further conclusion relating to the positive and negative facets.
To commence with, it is highly probable that one of the major contributions to the job-switching norm is by virtue of the significant ubiquity of entrepreneurship. Since the current labor job market may no longer offer assurance, many people strive to make money on their own by starting a new business. To cite an example, nowadays, there are several organizations founded to raise funds or invest in entrepreneurial ideas and creative innovations. As a result, employees who have an idea for a viable invention may have a chance to bring it to reality by embarking on the start-up journey. On the one hand, if the idea is successful, it can be advantageous for the entrepreneurs’ financial state. On the other hand, if the money goes down the drain, they could still accumulate a goldmine of experience for themselves.
Another factor leading to this phenomenon that is worth mentioning is the job market saturation. To specify, if a company has fully accommodated their customers with services and the customer acquisition opportunity is no longer high, they may strive to cut down on the remuneration of employees or even reduce the human resources. As a result, workers might have to switch to another job with a lower salary or less desirable promotion opportunities; thus, this can create a social prejudice towards those job hoppers. What is more, their employers may impose a thought of them not being able to make long-term contributions. By shedding light on these examples, it is crystal clear that switching jobs can be detrimental to their career prospects.
In conclusion, notwithstanding possible advantages for career switching, the negative downsides lurking beneath this norm are more considerable, such as employee termination or job instability. All things considered, I am of the viewpoint that the disadvantages of this notion have eclipsed the benefits it brings.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 817, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... goldmine of experience for themselves. Another factor leading to this phenomeno...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, so, still, thus, in conclusion, such as, as a result, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1993.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 376.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30053191489 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40348946061 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26935054007 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590425531915 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 624.6 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.4210720299 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.5625 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28451557225 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0795421827662 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0451153424385 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161298442801 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0237095965368 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.69 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 78.4519038076 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.