Many young people now know more about international pop and movie stars than famous people in the history of their countries. What are the causes? Give solutions to increase the number of people to know about famous people in history.
In this day and age, more teens are likely to opt for memorizing pop stars' information instead of the historic figures. This phenomenon is caused by several culprits and could be resolved in various ways.
There are numerous reasons for a shortage of knowledge about reputable historic people. Firstly, boredom in history lessons results in students being apathetic about their past. Specifically, history tutors are now commonly aged people who cannot catch up with advanced technology while teens approach renowned people online almost every day. Therefore, instead of realistic and lively lectures on screen, those teachers are inclined to give students ones that are replete with words and characters. This problem is also due to a lack of investment in training educators. Without tutorials, teachers can hardly be up to date with innovative gadgets, which are handy tools to illustrate appealing teachings.
To refrain from such a bleak future, some measures should be taken. The first prerequisite would be the awareness of the deficiency in understanding history, fostering a county's citizens to actively learn about the heroes that brought them independence. To give a clearer sight, Vietnam can be taken as the epitome since it has various festivals in which both teenagers and adults are incentivized to memorialize and show gratitude towards historic heroes. Besides, more payment from the government for education is inevitable as educators should be guided to give more practical and interesting lessons that encourage students to memorize history permanently.
In conclusion, the lack of knowledge about vital memorable figures originates from unrealistic lessons and a shortage of investment in education, which can be dealt with the cooperation of both citizens and the authorities.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, firstly, if, so, therefore, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1532.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53068592058 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89852805678 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620938628159 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.0401210205 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.846153846 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3076923077 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.38461538462 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150784268491 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0481656094407 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0532943877844 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0794891904618 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0502984941908 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.92 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.