The maps below show the changes that have taken place at the waterfront area of a town called Darwin between 2009 and 2014. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The maps depict the changes of a town named Darwin from 2009 to 2014
Overall, the initial impression from the maps is that the town showed the completely obliteration of the industrial area to make room for more residential, recreation and academic amenities. In addition, the town’s infrastructure was also renovated with the addition of a harbour and more trees.
In 2009, stretching from the center to the southern part of the town is industrial area. Over the next 5 years, the industrial zone became non-existent, and was replaced by trees, university building, and buildings for citizens. To the southeast of the town, a new harbour was erected, and an additional footpath was established, leading from the harbour to the main road in the west of the town.
Regarding the area encircled by the footpaths, the former industrial area was converted into a swimming pool. The school and the convention located in the vicinity of this area and the northern main road remained unchanged. The two swimming pools by the beach and the fishing area in the beach also located in the same position over the given period.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, regarding, so, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 2.0 24.0651302605 8% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 941.0 1615.20841683 58% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 188.0 315.596192385 60% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00531914894 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 4.20363070211 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81910377322 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 176.041082164 57% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.531914893617 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 278.1 506.74238477 55% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 16.0721442886 50% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.6569211239 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.625 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173814806587 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.07350696925 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0677340934534 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131969359631 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.074095128882 0.056905535591 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 78.4519038076 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.