In many countries people are spending more time in the workplace . Why is this? Is this a negative or positive development ?
In many countries, the issue that there is a significant increment of workaholic people have been received a great deal of time. It is attributed to some reasons and according me, it has both benefits and setbacks for society and individual.
There are two compelling reasons why people allocate more time to the workplace. First, since in the present scenario, the competition between youngsters raise sharply, everyone want to be better and get more success. Therefore, working for longer hours is considered as the best approach for them to have all comfort of life’s by earning extra money. Second, many people have a strong passion toward their job or research so they want do devote a great deal of time to work. Especially scientists, they can spend all their time to research something which they are interested in even though forget eating and sleeping.
Workaholic people become more and more is a development which has both advantages and disadvantages. On the one hand, when employees work with energy and motivated towards his work, he does not only enhance his productivity and chances of promotions but also raise the profits of company, Hence, it is a win-win situation for employees as well as employers. On the other hand. people contribute longer hours to work means they hardly make time for their family, which will gradually create distance between members of the family. For example, if the parents have not attended to the children’s prize giving at school for many times, their children would have a big disappointment for them, which make this family can not become a close-knit one.
In conclusion, allocating more time for work is a double-edged sword so everyone should balance between family and clerical work to get happiness.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 378, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: People
...s well as employers. On the other hand. people contribute longer hours to work means t...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, second, so, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1480.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08591065292 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74983238726 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591065292096 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 455.4 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.8120260206 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.846153846 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3846153846 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.84615384615 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180195604995 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0690672633143 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.066563671992 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102522238491 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0321322327531 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.