Whether reporting the ordinary peoples' lives and relationships should be more than celebrities on media has caused public controversy. While some experts assert that reflecting famous peoples' lives can absorb many audiences and entertain people, numerous others suggest that it has a negative impact on the people, especially the younger generation. I personally share the later viewpoint, referring to two reasons which I will explain.
Firstly, I think it should be a stick in mind that media has a vital role in the society. Popular people always show the glamorous parts of their lives, which I find very superficial. Ordinary people, especially adolescents, compare their lives with celebrities' lives on media and imitate them. It has malicious consequences because the real world beyond everyday parties and shopping. So, I believe reflecting ordinary peoples' lives with their challenges shows others that their life problem is not exterior.
On the other hand, reporting all ng of the aspects of the celebrity's lives and scrutinizing their life is a kind of privacy violation. For instance, famous people are always followed by paparazzi everywhere and every time, whether this is their choice or not, which I think is a kind of intrusion in their lives. However, if the media report ordinary peoples' lives, they are volunteers and choose to reflect their lives.
To sum up, in my opinion, contemporary media should pay more attention to ordinary peoples' lives. Because it can show various sort of the people challenges and also make more privacy for popular people.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, so, while, for instance, i think, kind of, sort of, in my opinion, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 41.998997996 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1324.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 250.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.296 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74051090127 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 414.0 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.2888929637 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.846153846 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2307692308 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.309824406023 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117072428037 0.084324248473 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109648141233 0.0667982634062 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196151240185 0.151304729494 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0263658920377 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.