Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion

There are different ideas about what we should do when we are in a bad situation. Some experts claim that the best way is accept it. Whereas others suggest that fighting with bad circumstances and making efforts to boost it is the best option. I share the latter viewpoint, and I will elaborate on my ideas in the following paragraphs.

On the one hand, a large group of people tend to keep their situation, although it is not beneficial for them. This group have various reasons for their behavior, such as scaring of novel things or afraid of making things worst by trying to improve them. For instance, there are a plethora of employees who do not like their occupation because of various measures, like work environment, low salary, and colleagues, but they do not try to change their job. This can be due to the fact that they are afraid if they leave their work for better job prospects, they would not another job consequently, they accept the bad aspects of their job. Also, some people avoid changing because of their character; psychological research shows that many introverted persons suffer from a lack of confidence, so they think there is no better situation for them and avoid risks.

On the other hand, some people opine that one of the differences between animals and humans is the ability of humans for boosting conditions. They assert although the risks of some actions can be high, people should try to take that risks because the consequences can improve their life quality. For example, if someone does not have enough money due to the low wage, it would not be logical that she/he accept that and human nature encourage him/her to try to change it, by working harder, changing the work and using bank grants and loans. Another practical example in contemporary life is the immigrants who migrate from their hometown country to another country for higher life quality. Even though the risks of migration is high, the benefits of this action overweight its drawbacks.

Having manifested the aforementioned subjects and examples, I think individuals should make an attempt for a better life and accept and tolerate some of the situations that is not logical.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 123, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'accepted'.
Suggestion: accepted
...Some experts claim that the best way is accept it. Whereas others suggest that fightin...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 216, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'things the worst'.
Suggestion: things the worst
...ing of novel things or afraid of making things worst by trying to improve them. For instance...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 400, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ures, like work environment, low salary, and colleagues, but they do not try to c...
^^
Line 5, column 405, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'accepts'.
Suggestion: accepts
...ge, it would not be logical that she/he accept that and human nature encourage him/her...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 18, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ight its drawbacks. Having manifested the aforementioned subjects and examples...
^^
Line 7, column 61, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he aforementioned subjects and examples, I think individuals should make an attem...
^^
Line 7, column 148, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...r a better life and accept and tolerate some of the situations that is not logical.
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, so, whereas, for example, for instance, i think, such as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 1.00243902439 898% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 3.15609756098 380% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 47.0 5.60731707317 838% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1819.0 965.302439024 188% => OK
No of words: 372.0 196.424390244 189% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88978494624 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 3.73543355544 118% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58556179268 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 106.607317073 181% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518817204301 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 551.7 283.868780488 194% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 1.53170731707 522% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 8.94146341463 168% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.8202770545 43.030603864 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.266666667 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.93333333333 5.23603664747 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174319714445 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0588880106906 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0425073330849 0.0843802449381 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110870683897 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0230956727602 0.0819641961636 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 40.7170731707 214% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.