Children's nurture and the boundaries of parents' responsibilities is one of the controversial debates in recent years. Some experts claim that parents are responsible for teaching social behaviour to children. Numerous others suggest that tutors should teach pupils the ways to be a good member of society. I will elaborate on both of these viewpoints in this essay, even though I share the first view.
On the one hand, large groups of people insist on parents' role in forming children's character. Parents are the first persons with whom infants interact; thus, they have a vital role in a child's personality. So, the parentship us more than providing the physical requirement and they should teach social and moral values to their child. Because when the students go to school, their character foundation is formed, and tutors only can be the reason for personality evolution.
On the other hand, several people opine that school is the place to teach children how to be a good society member. They believe that each family has its particular culture, and everyone teaches different criteria about being a good person to the children. Consequently, one of the teacher's duties, especially in elementary school, is to give a unique definition of a good citizen and train pupils proper behaviour.
Having manifested the aforementioned points of view, several think that the parent has to teach social behaviour values to their children because family is the first society that children contact. On the contrary, others assert that each family teach their children various criteria, so schools should be the place to give children specific definition for moral values. I believe that the second viewpoint ignores that, beyond the family cultures disparity, the factors of a responsible and productive member of society have a clear description and the diversity of the ways that parents treat their children cannot affect these factors.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 50, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'parents'' or 'parent's'?
Suggestion: parents'; parent's
...e hand large groups of people insist on parents role in forming childrens character Par...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 465, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... be the reason for personality evolution On the other hand several people opine t...
^^^
Line 3, column 114, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...children how to be a good society member They believe that each family has its pa...
^^
Line 3, column 409, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...itizen and train pupils proper behaviour Having manifested the aforementioned poi...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, if, second, so, thus, as to, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1595.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12861736334 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65744295913 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.488745980707 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 494.1 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 311.0 20.2975951904 1532% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1595.0 106.682146367 1495% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 311.0 20.7667163134 1498% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 84.0 7.06120827912 1190% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.394952879233 0.244688304435 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.394952879233 0.084324248473 468% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.249463588807 0.151304729494 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0889095446498 0.056905535591 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 158.2 13.0946893788 1208% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -244.19 50.2224549098 -486% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 124.6 11.3001002004 1103% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 13.95 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 22.77 8.58950901804 265% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 56.0 9.78957915832 572% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 126.4 10.1190380762 1249% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 125.0 10.7795591182 1160% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.