Raising children and finding the best method for bringing them up in the best way is one of the controversial discussions in recent years. Developing the contribution part of the children's character is one of the subjects which cause a lot of argument on childraising field. Some experts assert that motivate children to compete with their peers is necessary. In comparison, numerous others suggest that focusing on developing children's competitive character can affect the participation sense and influence their personality negatively. I share the latter viewpoint and think that co-operative children are more successful than competitive ones. I will explain both attitudes and give my reason why I agree with the second one.
In today's society, the rate of developing community is so high, and for this reason, some people believe that encouraging to compete makes them evolve at the same pace. This group claims that competing can play a role as a motivation engine and prevent failure. As a result, they try to activate their children's competition aspect and reach this goal they try various methods. For instance, several parents always compare their children with others, use it to boost their children's competitive part, and think that makes them more successful.
On the other hand, numerous parents outline raising a child who participates with others; the competitive part should not be encouraged. They believe comparing children with their classmates and motivating them to compete can negatively affect their character. For example, if parents always compare their child with peers, the jealousy aspect of a child's personality would be activated. Consequently, these children can not contribute to other people, and as a result, their efficiency will be less than others when they become older.
In conclusion, there are two outlooks about the competitive part of the children. Some people believe that parents should encourage this aspect because that makes them successful. In contrast, the others claim that teaching how to be co-operative is more crucial. In my opinion, the adults who have learned how to participate since their childhood are more productive for their society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 123, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'competing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'encourage' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: competing
...n, some people believe that encouraging to compete makes them evolve at the same pace. Th...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, if, look, second, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 24.0651302605 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1864.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 345.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40289855072 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86088571718 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524637681159 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 573.3 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.1339089588 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.555555556 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1666666667 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.83333333333 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.376846465659 0.244688304435 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12064842061 0.084324248473 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0743905564048 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.242525318565 0.151304729494 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0401490346146 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.