Medical technology can increase life expectancy. Is it a blessing or a curse?
With ever-growing progress made in the field of medical research, it is clear that life expectancy has increased by many folds. However, many intellectuals and analysts do not see this as a blessing and rather as a curse. On the other hand, there are also some sections of the community who celebrate a long life as a blessing. In the upcoming paragraphs, we will discuss whether the increase in life expectancy is considered a curse or blessing with clear examples. This will help us to conclude this topic with fair reasons. Firstly, we are aware of the greatest cures for most troubled diseases such as Polio, Rabbis, etc. We are also aware of cures for cancer such as chemotherapy which although increases the life expectancy of the patient, also equally makes their living very difficult. There were some shocking results from a recent survey conducted by the University of Philadelphia on cancer recovered patients. The results of the survey reveal that after recovery from cancer, patients cannot eat or pursue their hobbies as before. Basically, they can never live a normal life again. Their immunity, ability to digest any kind of food and energy to participate in outdoor activities such as playing, swimming, etc. all are affected. Such an expansion of life with compromises is a curse. On the contrary, we have success stories from patients who met with an accident and were countered with issues associated with cardiac, orthopedic, and other eye problems. Such patients are effectively treated with the most sophisticated equipment that trauma turns out to be a blessing. In summary, from all aspects discussed above, I believe that increase in life expectancy turns out to be a blessing only if the patient can live life to the fullest without any compromise. That is the real success of all progress made by medical technology.<br>
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, so, in summary, kind of, such as, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1542.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02280130293 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80578763807 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550488599349 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.1305679788 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.7058823529 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0588235294 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.05882352941 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.38176352705 23% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265841682227 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0795805748258 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101326769892 0.0667982634062 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.265841682227 0.151304729494 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.056905535591 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.54 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.