Is the mental strength important for success in sports or is it more important to have strong and fit people in sports. Discuss both views and give opinion.
It is true that mental and physical strength play a crucial role in success in many aspects of life, especially in sports. Some people claim that mental strength is more important due to the fact that it helps them have enthusiasm and encouragement to finish their goals, while others argue that being strong and fit exerts positive effects on success of athletes. I am going to dissect both views of this topic.
Granted, it is clear that in addition to ability, successful people need perseverance to pursue their target, especially in sports. Cristiano Ronaldo is a particular example. Although nobody can deny his talent, he spent many years to practice in Sporting CP before joining in Manchester United and becoming one of the most famous football players around the world. There are no many people have enthusiasm and persistence to overcome obstacles and their laziness for a long time. Therefore, mental strength has principle impact on how long they can reach goals.
However, in sports, physical ability exerts positive effects on people’s success. If you do not have special talent, in spite of spending more time, your achievement is not similar to a genius in this area. Besides, athletes need an appearance suit for the sport they play. For example, you cannot become a successful player in high jump if your height is under 160 centimeter. However, some people have demonstrated the opposite view when they gain a high result despite the fact that they do not have dominant bodies, such as Messi.
In conclusion, I would argue that although physical strength is necessary for sport players to achieve success, mental strength is more important for the development of athletes in the future.
.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-27 | thanhtu000 | 84 | view |
| 2021-02-12 | thuytram2008 | 56 | view |
| 2020-12-30 | viviannguyen | 78 | view |
| 2020-11-26 | oanhnghuyen | 84 | view |
| 2020-04-15 | HoangAnh452001 | 87 | view |
- The plans show the change of a small theater in 2010 and 2012 72
- People aim to achieve a balance between their work and lives But few people achieve it What are the causes of problems How to overcome it 61
- Some people feel that manufacturers and supermarkets have the responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging of goods Others argue that customers should avoid buying goods with a lot of packaging Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
- The line graph shows the percentage of New Zealand population from 1950 to 2050 78
- Some people feel that manufacturers and supermarkets have the responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging of goods Others argue that customers should avoid buying goods with a lot of packaging Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 376, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...all players around the world. There are no many people have enthusiasm and persist...
^^
Line 3, column 367, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'centimeter' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'centimeters'.
Suggestion: centimeters
...n high jump if your height is under 160 centimeter. However, some people have demonstrated...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...velopment of athletes in the future. .
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, if, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in spite of, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1434.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06713780919 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6203050986 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.586572438163 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 433.8 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.8670068017 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.428571429 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2142857143 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.78571428571 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.367950238521 0.244688304435 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105105017579 0.084324248473 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0846722766403 0.0667982634062 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.233567530896 0.151304729494 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0844643265716 0.056905535591 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.