Missions to explore space are hugely expensive, and there are problems on Earth which demand attention. The number of these missions needs to be reduced.
Do you agree or disagree?
Many people argue that instead of wasting such a huge amount of money to space exploration missions, we should shift the investment to address existing problems on Earth. I strongly agree with this statement since decreasing the number of space missions would result in various advantages.
Firstly, less investment in space missions allows more urgent global problems could be solved. Many researchers have pointed out some emerging issues with our world today, notable famine, illiterate and environmental pollution. These problems could be resolved with the cost lower than planning for outer space missions. Recently, a prestigious magazine has interviewed some economists and made a simple calculation which shows that we could wipe out an epidemic and supply enough clean water for Africa just by canceling only one space mission.
Another point is that many nations joining the space running just because it would deliver certain political advantages. This leads to the fact that governments collect taxes from citizens but use them inefficiently and haven’t focused on their countries’ needs. Fear of lagging behind in exploring space, various developing nations have joined by starting their own missions. However, these missions were not promising and as a consequence, brought a huge debt to nations, making their economic performance worse. This failure has brought serious social conflicts between the government and its people, which in some cases, resulted in violence and strikes to protest against continuing space missions.
To sum up, although space exploration could lead to significant scientific discovery, it is a better use of money to invest less in those missions and shift our focus to other current emerging problems.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 412, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...r own missions. However, these missions were not promising and as a consequence, brought a huge de...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, so, in some cases, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1498.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5687732342 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77212272294 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.661710037175 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.8461714512 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.833333333 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4166666667 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.16666666667 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247153537966 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.088885699737 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0587359804034 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149668715005 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0510104577385 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.83 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.