Modern forms of communication such as email and messaging have reduced the amount of time people spend seeing their friends. This has had a negative effect on their social lives.What extent do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and includ

People nowadays have concerned email and electronic message as new ways of communication which have affected our lives. Adversely, they are causes that create laziness and passivity that lead to the disconnection among people in one society. However, it would be a significant mistake if we ignored the advantages they bring to us.

Due to the appearance of new ways of communication, we can easily expand our friendslist because they can contact to people from any continents. Besides, we are able to keep in touch with our childhood friends who moved to other countries. In my case, I spend about 2 hours a week chatting with my friends who study abroad in the US or Europe. We even see each other via Skype or Facetime. As a result, our social relationship has been much closer. With traditional communication forms, it is impossible.

Moreover, with group chats or online forums, we can freely discuss problems and study in groups and arrange the time for a meeting or party without even leaving the bedroom. In the past, I had to meet my friends just for preparing a small party. But thank for convenient electronic message nowadays, we can reduce ineffective meetings. Compared to traditional communications, alternative modern communications waste less time and are more productive.

In our increasingly hurried and pressured life, time is extremely precious, electronic communication forms have been used as the best method of communication. Companies, schools, governments, etc. all need emails to run their projects. they are unable to replace.

However, if we depend too much on our smartphone for chatting and texting, it will be a risk. Smartphones lead people to socially isolate themselves from the outside world. People who are addicted to smartphone can easily lose their real friends. The solution is that just use email and messaging when we necessarily need and spend more time going out with friends.

In conclusion, modern ways of communication are really useful despite their negative effects. We need to understand both good and bad side of it to use it more cleverly.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 109, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ays of communication which have affected our lives. Adversely, they are causes th...
^^
Line 1, column 334, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gnored the advantages they bring to us. Due to the appearance of new ways of com...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 237, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
... all need emails to run their projects. they are unable to replace. However, if w...
^^^^

Discourse Markers used:
['besides', 'but', 'however', 'if', 'moreover', 'really', 'so', 'in conclusion', 'as a result']

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.227979274611 0.247107183377 92% => OK
Verbs: 0.147668393782 0.155533422707 95% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0880829015544 0.0946595960268 93% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0621761658031 0.0501214627716 124% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0880829015544 0.0437548338989 201% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.10103626943 0.122226691241 83% => OK
Participles: 0.0362694300518 0.0403226058552 90% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.00600763549 2.80594681477 107% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0362694300518 0.0326793684256 111% => OK
Particles: 0.00259067357513 0.00163938923432 158% => OK
Determiners: 0.0544041450777 0.0861772015684 63% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0181347150259 0.021408717616 85% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0155440414508 0.011925033212 130% => OK

Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2107.0 1933.35771543 109% => OK
No of words: 343.0 316.048096192 109% => OK
Chars per words: 6.14285714286 6.12580529183 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.20517956788 102% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.35860058309 0.374742101984 96% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.276967930029 0.28420135186 97% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.212827988338 0.203846283523 104% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.148688046647 0.137316102897 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00600763549 2.80594681477 107% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.037074148 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580174927114 0.56093040696 103% => OK
Word variations: 65.4719181468 60.7387585426 108% => OK
How many sentences: 23.0 16.0891783567 143% => OK
Sentence length: 14.9130434783 20.7743622355 72% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.6331410877 49.517814964 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.6086956522 127.492653851 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.9130434783 20.7743622355 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.391304347826 0.814263465372 48% => More Discourse Markers wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38877755511 137% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 3.99599198397 75% => OK
Readability: 42.6098364812 49.1944974215 87% => OK
Elegance: 1.22608695652 1.69124875643 72% => OK

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269150444646 0.332605444948 81% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0509950500795 0.102741220458 50% => Sentence sentence coherence is low.
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0496479169153 0.0668466124924 74% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.436504907147 0.534860350844 82% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.134489138876 0.148594505496 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0813290884816 0.134430193775 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0608909418378 0.0742795772207 82% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.191353582574 0.324371583561 59% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0411830474391 0.0638462369009 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162805776919 0.228012699653 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.021321801537 0.058150111329 37% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.

Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.68436873747 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.41683366733 176% => OK
Positive topic words: 7.0 5.90881763527 118% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 2.5751503006 155% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 1.9629258517 102% => OK
Total topic words: 13.0 10.4468937876 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.