There is incontrovertible evidence that working mothers make some issues regarding upbringing in advanced countries due to they have no enough time to spend with their children. However, it is likely that there can be found plenty of advantages for society to increase the number of working women.
When going out for work, women’s tiredness has negative effects on family particularly on offspring. Waking up early morning, carry out business responsibilities and then coming back home exhausted and tired cause reducing efficiency on working women. This might cause mothers to neglect in children-related matters and spouse either. These mothers, nonetheless, are an excellent role model for their toddler to become a multi-tasking person in future. For example, children learn how to divide their social activities and working hours alongside chores and family time.
Is it possible working of women outside the home with all possible problems have any merits for society our family? This is an unexpected question, but there are some concealed pitfalls. Surprisingly, the superior reason for women’s working outside is the simplest one, women’s delicate skills to management. Perhaps the majority of people would agree that women have been gifted natural abilities to control and manage difficult circumstances specially in didactic places as well as health centres. Many other young girls, moreover, could learn from working women to be financially independent. Working as an independent individual is always a sign of equal society.
On balance, as a coin has two sides, the advantages and disadvantages of rising the number of working women in society are identical such as better nurture in family or finer management in society as well as commercial independency.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 448, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...oddler to become a multi-tasking person in future. For example, children learn how to div...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 378, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ty of people would agree that women have been gifted natural abilities to control...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, nonetheless, regarding, so, then, well, for example, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1522.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53454545455 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02638534633 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.636363636364 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.1105218732 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.714285714 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6428571429 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.14285714286 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129348524275 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0472398181889 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0522329084907 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0792856799797 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0541152771085 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.