More and more parents are allowing their children to play on computers and tablets as they think that children should learn technology skills. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages.
In this day and age, there are numerous people permitting their children to commit to electronic devices such as laptops and ipads, which are considered to equip children with technology skills. From my perspective, this tendency possesses merits overshadow demerits.
To begin with, due to the cutting-edge technology, there are more and more businesses that hire employees who are proficient at using technical equipment. With the ability to use these devices, the process of working could be accelerated modernly and innovatively. For example, compared to those who have proficiency in using modern tools such as computers, have more opportunities than those who are not tech-savvy. Thereby, approaching modern devices at a young age could equip children the ability of technological solving skills.
In contrast, abusing electronic devices is assumed to have an adverse effect on the progress of youngsters growing up. Children may not take advantage of it for exploring technical skills, they might devote the entire day to playing on computers. For example, some young people are inclined to behave violently because they could absorb the violent content in action games by using computers. As a result, being addicted to playing electronic devices is no longer unfamiliar to young users.
In conclusion, although the appearance of modern devices could affect the users’ behavior, it cannot deny the markable advantage of approaching up-to-the-minute tools at a young age. In my view, I believe that children should be encouraged to use electronic devices with an accurate aim to equip themselves with essential skills.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
may, so, for example, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, as a result, in my view, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1383.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 252.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4880952381 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98031196106 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.575396825397 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.5645108543 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.25 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.08333333333 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163679620118 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.06041947872 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0530826109181 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103637297676 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0339853131105 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.75 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.