more and more people are moving away from an agricultural background to relocate to cities in order to look for work.
what will be consequences of this? What solutions can you offer?
World’s operations have increasingly changed via the intensive competition in search of jobs, a huge amount of countryside pupils attempt conveying to metro sites as they want to be offered better careers as correspondently included drawbacks. To indicate the inevitable downsides caused from this trend and ways to cope those troubles mentioned, this essay with use statistical resources coming up with logical resolutions.
To begin with, due to the dramatic rate of rural populations which have been arrived in metropolis areas, it is obvious and there is an indisputable fact that this trend can even contribute to the alarming level of unemployment. To illustrate clearer, the more remote background people come to metropolitan areas, the more extreme performance in term of job market operations. Thus, it not only drives the scarcity of employments fiercely but consequently increases criminal troubles among intensive job competition between downtown residents and rural pupils. Therefore, in government level, lawmakers should facilitate rural groups by promulgating regulations that benefit these people even when they are locating the countryside places. For example, social programs that powered from the authority as modern education systems and vocational industries for all countryside groups partially help farmers directly have jobs where they live and thereby it greatly cool the heat of job market competition in cities down.
Furthermore, it is undeniable that the more people gather together in a certain area like metropolitan, this phenomenon damage the earth’s resources as well as contaminations and congestions. To be specific, the littering rate especially in downtown have already been taken into consideration by a great arrival emote residents, it makes the scenario worse. To diminish and hopefully eliminate these unwanted consequences; in government level, farmers have to be provided an upgrade in living standard. That means, they are entitled to the uses of Internet and a better hygiene and sanitation systems as concrete water pumps and concrete roads. To fulfill their wishes, lawmakers can impose education supplements that are aforementioned is not enough, healthcare and modern facilities such as transportation have to be always available for farmers, the use of plowing apparatus instead of hand-plowing.
To sun up, the risks from farmers migration to urban areas seeking jobs can be lessened by these advices mentioned above. Ultimately, government have to be seriously involved in order to change rural groups’ cognitions and to develop the equilibrium of living standard between remote and urban areas
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 229, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... to the alarming level of unemployment. To illustrate clearer, the more remote bac...
^^
Line 2, column 963, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'cools'?
Suggestion: cools
... where they live and thereby it greatly cool the heat of job market competition in c...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, furthermore, if, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, such as, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2270.0 1615.20841683 141% => OK
No of words: 400.0 315.596192385 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.675 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.472135955 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12905337123 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 238.0 176.041082164 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 729.0 506.74238477 144% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.650625317 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 162.142857143 106.682146367 152% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5714285714 20.7667163134 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.85714285714 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167605521599 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0541531877706 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0363819831699 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0947678886357 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0249437722249 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.6 13.0946893788 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.14 50.2224549098 52% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.3001002004 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.55 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 140.0 78.4519038076 178% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.5 9.78957915832 209% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.