Some employers want to be able to contact their staff at all times, even on holidays.
Does this development have more advantages than disadvantages ?
(Reported 2017, GT Test)
With the heavy dramatic responsibility that have every single workers taken with today in workplace included the term of getting in touch. Therefore, the role then rises correspondently as whenever the boss attempt contacting their assistants, sub level staff have always to be available even in spare time or occasion. This essay will then debate about both merits and demerits before drawing a logical and acceptable conclusion.
First, there are strong advocators believe that the pension of time in workers have to be twenty four-seven on air so that their boss can deal with them on time. Thus, this perception directly put employees into a distress working environment as they have always squeeze their time on work even when they are on an excursion. This can be considered as disadvantage that significantly diminish a large portion of labor's work-desirability through the imposition from boss which is aforementioned. To explain, Staff tend to feel insecure all time resulting in losing control of work-life balance. However, people who support the fact mentioned above ignorant the meaning as if employees have been given chances to balance work and personal aspects by not having work duty in their personal time, they consequently refresh themself after workday so that in the long run business these workers can contribute to the career more effective and more accuracy
Furthermore, some may criticize that jobs included having in contact recently would rather negatively affect more for employees as to damage their personal life. For instance, during holidays nobody ever do want to work contemporarily. Resulting, the more they are filled up with responsibilities to workloads from boss, the more their time is taken away instead of squeezing some time to family and entertainment. However, it should be acknowledge that being available for boss every time he needs not only boost the business progress positively by being productively but also this is the opportunities for loyal, workaholic staff who want to have promotions from their recruiters. Thereby, a huge part of people chose a way as spending their time even after work or personal time for job contribution.
To sum up, there are many acceptable cognitions which have made todays labor to spend more time for work even on their spare time and holidays. Personally, the advantages from the fact as employers always have to be available for their recruiters can strongly overshadow its drawback by logical explanations already listed up.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 121, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... today in workplace included the term of getting in touch. Therefore, the role th...
^^
Line 3, column 264, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'squeezed'.
Suggestion: squeezed
...working environment as they have always squeeze their time on work even when they are o...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 103, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...ontact recently would rather negatively affect more for employees as to damage their person...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 205, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[3]
Message: The pronoun 'nobody' must be used with a third-person verb: 'does'.
Suggestion: does
...r instance, during holidays nobody ever do want to work contemporarily. Resulting,...
^^
Line 5, column 438, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'acknowledged'?
Suggestion: acknowledged
...nd entertainment. However, it should be acknowledge that being available for boss every tim...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r personal time for job contribution. To sum up, there are many acceptable cog...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, then, therefore, thus, as to, for instance, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2125.0 1615.20841683 132% => OK
No of words: 402.0 315.596192385 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28606965174 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47771567384 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93784043359 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 176.041082164 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567164179104 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 675.9 506.74238477 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 105.001482011 49.4020404114 213% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 151.785714286 106.682146367 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.7142857143 20.7667163134 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.57142857143 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234302356147 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0863865001195 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0391475977159 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153338900192 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0276517995954 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.0946893788 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 50.2224549098 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.