The number of people living in an urban area with small sized homes or homes without yards is increasing nowadays. While I agree that this trend can be detrimental, I believe that it can also have some positive effects.
On the one hand, living in a tiny and cramped space can be quite uncomfortable. People living in such small homes may like to have much furniture to relax, but lack of space does not allow them to buy such products. A king-size bed, a big sofa, or a television with a big screen, for example, has no place in those homes. Also, it would be too difficult to have guests who like to sleep over because those homes do not have extra rooms or beds most of the time. Above of these, by living in such homes there is less chance to do aerobic and anaerobic physical exercises as there is not enough room for sports equipment.
On the other hand, small sized accommodations may have some advantages. Firstly, it is much easier to keep those homes clean as fewer people live there. Secondly, utility bills are cheaper in those homes because regularly, small homes do not have huge appliances that consume too much energy or water. Finally, people living in these homes can go to public gyms to do physical activity. If they do so, they would probably be more socialized as they have more chances to communicate with others who are doing exercises.
In conclusion, I think living in a small living space can be considered a positive development from a specific point of view and a negative change from a different perspective.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, while, for example, i think, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1279.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.65090909091 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53609708603 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556363636364 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 420.3 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.0884502439 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.3846153846 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1538461538 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.84615384615 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.33433471374 0.244688304435 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112403892226 0.084324248473 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0608247287658 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20280574997 0.151304729494 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0389754407219 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.69 12.4159519038 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 78.4519038076 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.