More and more people in the city live in small space & without outdoor space. Do you think it is a negative or positive development?
With the increasing population of urban areas, more inhabitants must have to settle in cramped houses with no outdoor spaces for convenience and savings. In my view, this trend brings both positive and negative aspects, however, I believe its advantage outweigh the disadvantages.
Firstly, there is no denying the fact that when living in a tiny house without sufficient green space nearby, residents will lack the space for physical exercise. This reason indirectly contributes to the sedentary lifestyle of citizens and cause fatal diseases such as obesity, heart attack and diabetes. Furthermore, reducing the acreage of green spaces will impact negatively the atmosphere, as we know, plants absorb pollutants produced by vehicles and factories. As a result, the air in big cities is seriously polluted, affecting people's health. For example, the World Health Organization in 2014 estimated air pollution kills 7 million people each year.
On the other hand, the expense of living in major cities more and more expensive, therefore, many people decide to choose this kind of habitat because more modest space consumed means less money cost. In addition, there are some different reason such as lack of land and natural disasters that do not allow the construction of large houses. For example, Japan is a pioneer in the field of small houses because about 70% of the area is mountains and forests, living costs are among the most expensive in the world and this is the also country most influenced by nature from Asia.
In conclusion, I believe living in confined and non-outdoor space does have both pros and cons. Nevertheless, in the end, it is safe to say that leading a life in limited space seems to be more beneficial to city dwellers when it comes to good financial management.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, such as, as a result, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1505.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11904761905 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71127695413 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632653061224 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 471.6 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.5240057744 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.416666667 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 15.75 7.06120827912 223% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.354617334284 0.244688304435 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103994298585 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0774765556601 0.0667982634062 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191228028174 0.151304729494 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0284002962599 0.056905535591 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.