It is widely acknowledged that a growing number of individuals, in recent years, get news about the world through virtual platforms instead of reading newspapers or watching TV programs. While this trend may have benefits in certain aspects, I believe that it can be an adverse development.
On the one hand, taking advantage of the Internet in order to access news will bring several benefits to society as a whole. First, the use of online news allows readers to get information instantaneously. By utilizing Internet-connected devices, in fact, people can make it easy to access unlimited information everywhere, which not only brings convenience but also keeps up with what is going on around the world. Second, if readers use the Internet to get news, they can choose topics that are reasonable to their interest. For example, in E-news, such as BBC News, teenagers can search content for their age group like technology-related news, promoting reading culture among the young generation.
On the other hand, I would argue that reading news through the Internet might be a detrimental development. One obvious drawback is that not all online information has an official source and has been censored carefully. In other words, since nowadays there are numerous tabloids that are rampant on virtual platforms, people can get inaccurate information, leading to far-reaching repercussions, such as manifestation. Furthermore, if someone regularly reads online news they are contributing to the loss of traditional value of their country. Indeed, newspapers and TV programs have survived for a long period, becoming a part of culture, if they disappear it can affect certain aspects.
In conclusion, although the Internet can help readers get information immediately and stay updated, I still believe that it will cause negative effect on not only cultural value but also social awareness.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, may, second, so, still, while, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1597.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35906040268 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11637305226 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597315436242 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6034418145 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.846153846 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9230769231 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1538461538 7.06120827912 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.327637989698 0.244688304435 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112178769604 0.084324248473 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0746186228893 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189427912533 0.151304729494 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0620857190151 0.056905535591 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.