More and more people want to buy clothes, cars and other items with famous brands. What are the reasons? Do you think it is a positive or negative development?

Since the beginning, individuals have consistently been searching for a superior look. Appropriately, individuals go through heaps of cash to purchase things from popular brands, which are mostly because of promoting and present day way of life.

Preceding all, brands organizations spending a gigantic measure of cash on publicizing their items on television or web based life so as to draw in clients. For instance, brands like Dior or Chanel procure excellent and global models to promote their new assortment of shoes, dresses, watches or cosmetics makeup on boards or television, with the goal that everybody intrigued by the model's appearance and needs to purchase those things from the celebrated brands.

Aside from the brand's exposure, the advancement of innovation and urban communities could be a main factor in changing individuals' ways of life. Numerous people reluctantly need to purchase new and present day things since they need this thing for their business or their social picture, likewise different needs to have high caliber and elegant things. For example, numerous occupations like legal counselors, specialists or planners need to glance proficient in their office so they enhance their work environment with furniture, PCs, artistic creations or figures from understood brands to intrigue their customers and clients.

In spite of the fact that this marvel could impactsly affect society like the utilization of items or advance extravagance, from my perspective there are increasingly profitable on this theme. Clearly, numerous human accomplishments and make openings for work and improve the financial circumstance have been because of the popularity for items from society. As an outline, individuals love to have new innovation like cell phones, autos or devices with the goal that organizations buckle down each day to imagine new material or procedures to fabricate new product and this could change include life, additionally it gives Employments to youngsters which need to begin their vocations or organizations.

Taking everything into account, commercials, and changes in individuals' shop's propensities are the most explanations behind purchasing luxury things among people, and this can have pessimistic or constructive outcomes on individuals' lives from various perspectives.

Votes
Average: 1.1 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 132, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...r items on television or web based life so as to draw in clients. For instance, brands l...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 385, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'models'' or 'model's'?
Suggestion: models'; model's
...he goal that everybody intrigued by the models appearance and needs to purchase those ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 16, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'brands'' or 'brand's'?
Suggestion: brands'; brand's
...e celebrated brands. Aside from the brands exposure, the advancement of innovation...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 400, Rule ID: NEW_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'innovation'.
Suggestion: innovation
...As an outline, individuals love to have new innovation like cell phones, autos or devices with...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, likewise, look, so, as to, for example, for instance, in fact, in spite of

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 10.4138276553 230% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1979.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 349.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.67048710602 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06277590078 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587392550143 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 606.6 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.2975951904 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 75.3438399265 49.4020404114 153% => OK
Chars per sentence: 179.909090909 106.682146367 169% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.7272727273 20.7667163134 153% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.09090909091 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0399772852911 0.244688304435 16% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0170786036724 0.084324248473 20% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0117869244097 0.0667982634062 18% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0234809613764 0.151304729494 16% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0149026469604 0.056905535591 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.1 13.0946893788 161% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.55 50.2224549098 63% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.3001002004 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.2 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.29 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.1190380762 142% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.