There is a little room for doubt that in this modern era the individuals’ tendency around the world to purchase luxurious stuffs made by well-knows brands has significantly increased. However, there could be various reasons for this occurrence and overall, to my mind, this trend has advantages and disadvantages in equal measure.
The first and foremost reason is that top producers undoubtedly attach great importance to quality of their productions. The more the quality of a product like garments or gadgets is remarkable, the more people are tempted to buy them. To demonstrate, purchasing a durable and superior product which could be used constantly is more persuasive compared to use an inferior stuff that are more likely to become destroyed. Secondly, prominent producers frequently take captivating advertisements into consideration in order to induce purchasers. For instance, sponsorship of popular athletes or actors is one of the most common procedures of introducing their productions to the world. Finally, people, particularly teenagers and young adults, are prone to use latest-released items made by the most outstanding brands to look fashionable and eccentric.
Turning to possible repercussions, these alterations in individuals’ taste would be accompanied by desirable and unfavorable consequences simultaneously. On the positive side, less well-known companies are forced to raise their products’ quality to compete with outstanding producers. To cite an illustration, there are significant number of Chinese electronics companies like Xiaomi and Huawei which have achieved a remarkable segment of cell-phone market by making their devices’ quality closer to more famous brands like Apple and Samsung. On the negative side, a great passion about owing high-priced commodities would give rise people to be distracted from much more important aspects of life. It has been proven that those young adults who laser focus attention on costly and extraordinary stuffs of eminent brands are more likely to quit their study at initial levels.
To sum up, after meticulous scrutiny of reasons, adverse and favorable consequences of increasing in the disposition to own costly products of leading brands, it can be rationally concluded that diverse ranges of causes play pivotal role in this trend from commodities quality to attitudes toward fashion. Moreover, detrimental and advantageous outcomes could be derived from this occurrence based on disparate standpoints.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 758, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a laser'.
Suggestion: who is a laser
...has been proven that those young adults who laser focus attention on costly and extraordi...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, for instance, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 41.998997996 148% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2143.0 1615.20841683 133% => OK
No of words: 373.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.74530831099 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39467950092 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29722747009 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 176.041082164 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613941018767 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 677.7 506.74238477 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.1807116343 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.866666667 106.682146367 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8666666667 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242826565253 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0715474581974 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0555598088305 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138989263715 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0411653817505 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.0946893788 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.37 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.58 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 136.0 78.4519038076 173% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.