There is no denying that nowadays modern civilization trend to use well-known brands in their daily life. There are main tow facts behind on this situation. Advertisement and to show off the luxurious. In my opinion this is negative development.
To specify in recent period peoples are believing the concept advertising by the product company. Some time peoples are influenced by the other persons to buy the brand items. In other hand they don't want to observe or analyze about the products. For example: In my country, Bangladesh, peoples are using the I Phone rapidly rather than other phone. Even though they are not getting good facilities from them but still using it impact by others persons and company advertisement.
However, there is other main reason is luxurious. Some time peoples want to show off their wealthy by using the brand items just like, Mercerize and Ferrari. They feel proud in-front of peoples having a brand clothes, watch and perfume. This kind of luxurious can't be count as development. For example; In India most people loved to use brand items but there are some place where peoples don't know how to write, even their not able to eat properly in a day. So it can't not be count as development. In addition, most European country are the best example for this fact.
In conclusion, human must be award about what they're using or buying. They should know what is advantage or disadvantage. Government must take the responsibility for the company and take care the situation to make the peoples life easier and safe.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 37, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
... To specify in recent period peoples are believing the concept advertising by the product ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 196, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...buy the brand items. In other hand they dont want to observe or analyze about the pr...
^^^^
Line 3, column 306, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'I'?
Suggestion: the; I
... country, Bangladesh, peoples are using the I Phone rapidly rather than other phone. ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 429, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'impacts'?
Suggestion: impacts
...facilities from them but still using it impact by others persons and company advertise...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 261, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...tch and perfume. This kind of luxurious cant be count as development. For example; I...
^^^^
Line 5, column 389, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... but there are some place where peoples dont know how to write, even their not able ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 465, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ot able to eat properly in a day. So it cant not be count as development. In additio...
^^^^
Line 5, column 465, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'cants'?
Suggestion: cants
...ot able to eat properly in a day. So it cant not be count as development. In additio...
^^^^
Line 7, column 47, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: they're
...clusion, human must be award about what theyre using or buying. They should know what ...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 219, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...and take care the situation to make the peoples life easier and safe.
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 249, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... make the peoples life easier and safe.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, still, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1292.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91254752852 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60326075532 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.574144486692 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 404.1 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.2975951904 64% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.2492088996 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 68.0 106.682146367 64% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.8421052632 20.7667163134 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.15789473684 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 5.01903807615 219% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174331216207 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0529110229632 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0538776444492 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0955878195728 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0478973189482 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.6 13.0946893788 66% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.74 50.2224549098 133% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.3001002004 64% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.61 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.78957915832 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.1190380762 71% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.