More people put their personal information online e q address telephone number for everyday activities such as socializing on social networks or banking purposes is this positive or negative development

Essay topics:

More people put their personal information online (e.q address, telephone number) for everyday activities such as socializing on social networks or banking purposes , is this positive or negative development?

In modern society, people tend to leak out their personal information online for everyday activities such as socializing on social networks or banking purposes. This is a negative development that leads to dangerous problems

At first, losing data. It means that everyone can get your phone number, your address they will make a bad purpose on it. For example, sending your information to an online shop. Then they will get their order and shipping to your address. In some cases, when you are not at home and your family doesn't know maybe they will pay for that pack.

Furthermore, being hacked. By sharing too much information, everyone knows and the hacker too. They may pretend like they are bank tellers and then say exactly what they get from your social activities, asking you to refill your privacy information on the fake website, and for credulous people, they will get their bank account hacked and lose all of their money

To sum up, sharing too much personal information lead to negative problem and development. Try to avoid updating or covering a few numbers, words in order not to lose your information or money.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 297, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...hen you are not at home and your family doesnt know maybe they will pay for that pack....
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 113, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to like'
Suggestion: to like
...ws and the hacker too. They may pretend like they are bank tellers and then say exac...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, may, so, then, for example, such as, in some cases, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 41.998997996 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 946.0 1615.20841683 59% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 192.0 315.596192385 61% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92708333333 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 4.20363070211 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50881691767 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 176.041082164 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.635416666667 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 287.1 506.74238477 57% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 89.9942220368 49.4020404114 182% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.6 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.1 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288261970682 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108487385951 0.084324248473 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.136862682804 0.0667982634062 205% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209165244574 0.151304729494 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.187354028014 0.056905535591 329% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 78.4519038076 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.