In most countries, fast food is becoming cheaper and more available. Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?
It is true that fast food is more affordable and ubiquitous in some countries. While this tendency has several benefits, I believe overall the drawbacks are more significant.
On the one hand, there is no doubt that the ubiquity of fast food brings about an enormous convenience for people in modern life. Instead of spending too much time on cooking or preparing the meals, they can order from fast food outlets or restaurants. Not only is that trend so time-saving but it also contributes to reducing pressure on young people. Take office staff as an example. To make a decent living and meet the high standard, they must work overtime as much as possible, meaning that they tend to arrive home at about 10 p.m. In that case, fast food is a perfect alternative, providing them for a convenient dinner.
However, despite the advantage mentioned above, I believe that they are negated by these following problems. First of all, that tendency is the culprit of obesity among young people. It is undeniable that most fast food is processed with so much oil, which is the key factor appealing people to consume. The ripple effect on the high amount of fat in convenience food such as chips and fried chicken, increases the risk of suffering from being overweight. In addition, food hygiene is also of major concern when fast food is cheaper and easier to access. The fact is that there is no certainty that the cooking process would be safer than home-cooked food. For instance, it is likely that workers in fast food stores can choose the spoiled materials or use some chemicals to make food fresher.
In conclusion, although the growing popularity in fast food has an enormous benefit, I believe that it is outweighed by the problems mentioned above.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, first of all, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1458.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8438538206 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60681143041 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578073089701 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 450.0 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9056294417 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.2 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0666666667 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.46666666667 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203920563099 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0672452827058 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0506886627598 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130942227225 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0372271981779 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.