Most countries want to improve standard of living through economic development, however, others think social value is lost as a result. Do you think the advantages of economic development outweigh the disadvantages?
In recent years, the undeniable fact has been presented that most of the countries focus their economic growth to raise living standards. Whereas, there is debate on the issue that such approach can lead to disappearance of important social values. This essay discusses both advantages and disadvantages associated with the issue before coming to empirical conclusion.
To begin with, country’s economy plays pivotal role in the development of living conditions. It means that sustainable economy which includes good job opportunities in all sectors, advanced developing industries and growing currency can bring benefits to countrymen providing the all luxuries of life. In other words the more money a country has, the better the residents live in terms of health, comfort and education. The clear example of this can be such counties like Singapore, Switzerland and Norway which are few of the richest countries in the world and at the same time have the highest life quality.
Nevertheless, the opponents opine that inculcating such living status may result in the humiliation of social values by imitating other cultures and attitudes blindly. To enumerate, the acceptance of other cultures and beliefs may lead to disappearance of their own and may result in imbalance in the society. For example, human values as kindness, honesty and sincerity will remain on the sideline and can increase the rate of divorces, crimes especially financial.
In fact, fast growing economy in no way can detrimentally affect the values of society. On the contrary, it will motivate society to progress and succeed in the world of high competition. Thus, people can provide themselves with high standards of living.
To sum up, the economic development has more pros than cons in terms of advanced living standards and people should not hamper their growth believing the myth that it may deform their social structure.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-13 | Imagine Ho | 89 | view |
| 2019-02-12 | zentirot | 89 | view |
| 2018-10-28 | vishal sachdeva | 84 | view |
| 2018-10-28 | vishal sachdeva | 78 | view |
- Some people believe that improve public health should increase the number of sports facilities others believe that it has little effects and need other measures to improve it Discuss both views and give your opinion 90
- People can perform everyday tasks such as shopping and banking as well as business transactions without meeting other people face to face What are the effects of this on individual and society as a whole 78
- In some countries young people do not take care of their elderly relatives Instead they appoint trained professionals who take care of elderly Is it positive or negative trend according to you 77
- Some people thinks that money is one the most essential factors in promoting happiness Do you think people can be happy without much money What other factors contribute towards happiness 73
- Consumer goods have become the most important part of people s life Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 139, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...nomic growth to raise living standards. Whereas, there is debate on the issue that such...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, nevertheless, so, thus, whereas, for example, in fact, in other words, on the contrary, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1623.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35643564356 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87430136538 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587458745875 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.3546735007 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.928571429 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6428571429 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.64285714286 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194006369856 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0604213555559 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0455973801859 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.099177439605 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0365594805726 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.