Most countries want to improve standard of living through economic development, however, others think social value is lost as a result. Do you think the advantages of economic development outweigh the disadvantages?
The issue of whether economic growth is able to ameliorate the quality of life or threatens social values has triggered intense debate. In my opinion, it seems to me that the possible benefits of economic development pale in comparison with the potential dangers.
To take the development of the economy at face value, there are two main associated benefits that we can reap. First of all, economic growth opens up ample job opportunities, especially for the young generations. This will be proven by looking at Ho Chi Minh City, the emergence of a vast variety of start-up companies, due to the financial support from municipal budgets, has eased the competitiveness of job market in recent years. Secondly, economic prosperity may have plenty of positive impacts on the education system. With the wealthy economy, the government is able to pay more proper regard to the advancement of educational services, such as supplying leading-edge devices for teaching purposes or building schools in rural areas. Therefore, there is a possible connection between economic development and the improvement of living standard.
On the other hand, it is necessary to take the drawbacks into account. Owing to the acceleration of economic growth, it may carry a certain degree of risk to the environment. To begin with, a massive rise in the number of industrial factories can result in multiple types of pollution, from noise pollution to water contamination to polluted air. For instance, without regular inspections from authorities, factories may dump their chemical waste directly into the sea, which poses a huge threat to marine life. On top of that, in pursuit of the wealthy nation, there is an ever-increasing demand for new technological breakthroughs, and thereby a less focus on national achievements, events which shape a nation. Thus, it can be concluded that the need for rapid economic development has a number of counter-productive effects on society.
In conclusion, it is my personal belief that the aftermath of economic growth is more significant than the advantage.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, for instance, in conclusion, such as, first of all, in my opinion, to begin with, on the other hand, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1756.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28915662651 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15739092188 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614457831325 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 566.1 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8768190594 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.066666667 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1333333333 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.7333333333 7.06120827912 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15505150551 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0572885976481 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0604819164079 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0944085155121 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.033210364566 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.82 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.