The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
<p style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-top: 20px; margin-bottom: 0px; color: rgb(40, 40, 40); font-family: Nunito, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; white-space: normal;">The table provided gives information on the underground railway systems in terms of the routes covered, passengers travelling annually and the year the railway system was initiated. The indicated information in the table is for six cities.</p><p style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-top: 20px; margin-bottom: 0px; color: rgb(40, 40, 40); font-family: Nunito, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; white-space: normal;">As per the table, the oldest underground railway service provider is in London and also covers the longest rail routes (1863 and 394 km of routes). On the other hand, Los Angeles is the latest as it opened in 2001 and covers the second least railway route of 28 km.</p><p style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-top: 20px; margin-bottom: 0px; color: rgb(40, 40, 40); font-family: Nunito, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; white-space: normal;">Furthermore, Tokyo railway service initiated in 1927 but consists the largest number of travellers (1927 passengers) among all other six cities, while It is Kyoto that consists of the least number of travellers (45 passengers).</p><p style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-top: 20px; margin-bottom: 0px; color: rgb(40, 40, 40); font-family: Nunito, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; white-space: normal;">Overall, two of the oldest systems are London and Paris but it is Paris and Tokyo that has a large number of passengers travelling annually; meanwhile, it is London that has the largest route travelled (394 km).</p>
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1533, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...aris but it is Paris and Tokyo that has a large number of passengers travelling annually; meanwhi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, second, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 16.0 33.7804878049 47% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1433.0 965.302439024 148% => OK
No of words: 224.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 6.39732142857 4.92477711251 130% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 4.43364259981 2.65546596893 167% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.455357142857 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 372.6 283.868780488 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 3.0 8.94146341463 34% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 74.0 22.4926829268 329% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 256.411561535 43.030603864 596% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 477.666666667 112.824112599 423% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 74.6666666667 22.9334400587 326% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 21.3333333333 5.23603664747 407% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 1.0 3.83414634146 26% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0925227771221 0.215688989381 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0982323547687 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0466352607625 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0925227771221 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 46.0 13.2329268293 348% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -12.09 61.2550243902 -20% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 18.2 6.51609756098 279% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 33.3 10.3012195122 323% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 21.02 11.4140731707 184% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.83 8.06136585366 134% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 21.0 11.4329268293 184% => OK
gunning_fog: 31.6 10.9970731707 287% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 21.0 11.0658536585 190% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum two paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.