As most foreign aid often benefits the donor more than the receiver, developing countries should refuse to repay their debts.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
These days, many developed countries usually support for some developing countries to overcome many difficulties, which makes the relationship of many countries become more harmonized. In my opinion, I strong believe that there are some benefits brought for both the donor or the receiver.
First of all, developing countries might face to many obstacles when they have to repay money they received from other countries. For examples, there is a shortfall in their budget, which affects to economy negatively. It directly influences to Gross Domestic Product, CPI, interest,…so developing countries might have more many big problems. Whereas, developed countries can have many benefits from the situation. For instance, they can take the interest from debts to earn much more money or they can control or impact to policies of countries they supported.
However, I believe that most developing countries also have many benefits. If developing countries is facing to some difficulties such as war, epidemic diseases or natural disasters, they will need aid from other countries. Or by borrowing money from foreign countries, they can develope infrastructure to improve quality of the life, supporting for small local companies. Which enables their economy to become to prosper. In addition, helping between countries helps relationship better. They might cooperate and develop together, so the life becomes peaceful and beautiful.
In conclusion, I think that both the donated countries and the received countries receive some benefits equally.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 210, Rule ID: BELIEVE_BELIEF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'belief' (noun) instead of believe (verb)?
Suggestion: belief
...ore harmonized. In my opinion, I strong believe that there are some benefits brought fo...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ht for both the donor or the receiver. First of all, developing countries might...
^^^
Line 3, column 283, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , …
...to Gross Domestic Product, CPI, interest,…so developing countries might have more ...
^^
Line 3, column 344, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ries might have more many big problems. Whereas, developed countries can have many bene...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... policies of countries they supported. However, I believe that most developing ...
^^^
Line 5, column 50, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...I believe that most developing countries also have many benefits. If developing c...
^^
Line 5, column 375, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
..., supporting for small local companies. Which enables their economy to become to pros...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e life becomes peaceful and beautiful. In conclusion, I think that both the don...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, so, whereas, for example, for instance, i think, in addition, in conclusion, such as, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1326.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 234.0 315.596192385 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.66666666667 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88262672825 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 176.041082164 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.568376068376 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 405.9 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.6362829716 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.7142857143 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7142857143 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.92857142857 7.06120827912 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187539331644 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.074931067339 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0321879676972 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125214516925 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0233645282116 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.31 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.