The most important aim of science should be to improve people's lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
It is sometimes argued that the enhancement of society’s life quality should be considered the first priority of science. In my opinion, I completely agree with this view.
First and foremost, science could play a major part in curing diseases which are inherited and unavoidable with the help of genetic engineering technologies. This could be explained by the fact that the majority of human genetic maps have been intensively investigated, which has led to a deep understanding of the functions of individual genes. This would further allow scientists to eliminate unwanted genes or prevent undesirable gene clusters in a genome set. As a result, inherited diseases which have been devasting to many people and their families will soon be a matter of the past.
Another point worth mentioning is that replacements for body parts would be made possible for much-needed organ transplant surgeries. This is mainly because with the advancement of science, cloning human organs will be much more feasible, allowing more people to have access to body part replacements without having to withstand a time-consuming waiting period for a suitable donor. Consequently, by being able to have a transplant in a timely manner, human life expectancy is expected to be much longer than it was ever before.
In conclusion, for the reasons I have discussed above, I maintain that the most crucial purpose of science is to provide humankind with an advancement in the quality of life. It can be expected that in the near future, all human life will be extensively enhanced in all possible aspects.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 433, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a timely manner" with adverb for "timely"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...tly, by being able to have a transplant in a timely manner, human life expectancy is expected to b...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, if, so, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1336.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17829457364 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98674032205 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.585271317829 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 425.7 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.0375197714 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.454545455 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4545454545 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.36363636364 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169483382472 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0694125877156 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.03404843682 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111463014853 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0277961248024 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.