Most people believe that stricter punishment should be given for traffic offences. To what extent do you agree ?
No one would deny that traffic congestion is a serious issue in a urban areas owing to enormous use of private vehicle with extreme speed which in result accident occurs. That is why I think strict punishment should be given for traffic offences.
Firstly, it is clearly seen that in the urban areas due to lack of reliable public transport facilities folks use their own vehicle. Many people have no sense how to drive and they infringed all the traffic rules and regulation and got accident badly. For instance, drivers of heavy vehicles which is used for day to day transportation sometimes drives vehicle in drunk or in a sleepy condition may astraied from the road cause the gigantic accident which affects detrimentally to the other vehicles. One more clear example to advocate the strong punishment for traffic rules breaker is, sometimes under age children also drives bike without any safety and knowledge and they harm to the others and their livers also. Thus to reduce these some suitable and reliable punishment is given to the children like, a bit charge on to them.
Secondly, one argument put forward in favor of strict punishment to traffic offences is that in urban areas employees must have to reach on time at office and because of that they will disobey all the traffic rules to reach on time and they got catastrophe and was hurted their lives.
To sum up all the arguments, it is evident that to deter the accidents, reduce the traffic congestion, I strongly believe that strict punishment should given to traffic offenders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
No one would deny that traffic congestio...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 73, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...raffic congestion is a serious issue in a urban areas owing to enormous use of pr...
^
Line 1, column 81, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'area'?
Suggestion: area
...ongestion is a serious issue in a urban areas owing to enormous use of private vehicl...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... should be given for traffic offences. Firstly, it is clearly seen that...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 721, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...hey harm to the others and their livers also. Thus to reduce these some suitable and...
^^^^
Line 3, column 727, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...rm to the others and their livers also. Thus to reduce these some suitable and relia...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ldren like, a bit charge on to them. Secondly, one argument put forward in fa...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...astrophe and was hurted their lives. To sum up all the arguments, it is evide...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 161, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[2]
Message: Did you mean 'have given' or 'give'?
Suggestion: have given; give
...y believe that strict punishment should given to traffic offenders.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, may, second, secondly, so, thus, for instance, i think, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1293.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89772727273 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52805368629 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564393939394 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 405.9 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.6202582615 49.4020404114 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.666666667 106.682146367 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.3333333333 20.7667163134 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.66666666667 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.01903807615 179% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210678648889 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105132289842 0.084324248473 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114532980884 0.0667982634062 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146155244005 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0648242557495 0.056905535591 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 50.2224549098 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.