As most people spend a major part of their adult life at work, job satisfaction is an important element of individual wellbing. What factors contribute to job satisfation? How realistic is the expectation of job satisfaction for all workers?
It is not arguable that a job consequently engrosses most time of people's life. Someones believe that welfare at work place is much more vital for personal prosperity. This essay will discuss the importance of two job endowment and argue over the accordance of the reality with employees' waitings.
There are two main contributions for making the job enjoyable. First and foremost, the high salary and good perks. For living, we utilize products and services, so that, having enough money affects our well-being. As, we becoming more delighted and satisfied by using qualitative products and quantitative services. In short, earnings is one of the most valuable sides of endowment. On the other hand, a tolerant and friendly environment at the work place is not fewer factor than the gaining. The people with different characters and temperaments have to work in a team. As we spend most of our time at work, being friendly towards others, and building amiable environment is definitely necessary for easy-going and smooth working.So, these two contributions are most important.
But does all employees' expectation come true? Not all employers give credit for their workers and set equal and tolerant environment at work. Especially, in poverty-stricken countries people are forced to find job even though the work-places do not guarantee them good salaries, and working environment is rivalrous and predatory. In sum, in some poor countries the reality does not justify itself.
All in all, a job fills all people's time completely. This essay discussed the main factors of endowment indicating high salary and perks as the main contirbutions, and giving example on a friendly and tolerant environment as the main condition for prolific work process.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 308, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ons and the convenience of expectation. First and foremost, the high salary and ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 380, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f the most valuable sides of endowment. On the other hand, a tolerant and friend...
^^^^
Line 5, column 354, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: So
...ssary for easy-going and smooth working.So, a good community is another important ...
^^
Line 5, column 421, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ther important moment for contribution. Let us consider the fact as if all emplo...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 36, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'employees'' or 'employee's'?
Suggestion: employees'; employee's
... Let us consider the fact as if all employees expectation come true? Not all employer...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 349, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
... environment is rivalrous and predatory.In sum, in some poor countries the reality...
^^
Line 9, column 417, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es the reality does not justify itself. To conclude all mentioned above, even th...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, if, so, well, for example, in fact, in short, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1500.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37634408602 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05145301058 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.587813620072 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 456.3 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.2634707988 49.4020404114 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.142857143 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9285714286 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.35714285714 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.289510822562 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.092915547287 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0574504735483 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146583347782 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0733178097102 0.056905535591 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.