The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now, and plans for its development. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The map below provides an illustration of the expansion plan of the Islip town centre, whereas the other map above depicts its current condition. In general, it seems, that the town's development is unfinished and has notable changes to the contrary of the plan.
Regarding the map below, it was predicted to build a dual carriageway around the main facilities. However, now the road's construction is uncompleted and has some misleading, such as being partly built from the western and eastern sides.
As for the other amenities, planned by the map below, a prediction of a pedestrian road in the middle was substituted with the main road. As well as, a car park, a bus station and a new housing intended to settle along the northern part of the countryside, were totally removed. Consequently, a shopping centre was expanded at this part of the town, encompassing the significant part of the square. The considerable change is seen in the scope of the park, as it is developed twice as more as it was predicted by the plan.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 178, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'towns'' or 'town's'?
Suggestion: towns'; town's
...ndition. In general, it seems, that the towns development is unfinished and has notab...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 116, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'roads'' or 'road's'?
Suggestion: roads'; road's
...d the main facilities. However, now the roads construction is uncompleted and has som...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 238, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ilt from the western and eastern sides. As for the other amenities, planned by t...
^^^^
Line 5, column 491, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
... park, as it is developed twice as more as it was predicted by the plan.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, however, if, regarding, so, well, whereas, as for, in general, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 851.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80790960452 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91010362677 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604519774011 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 15.1554445662 43.030603864 35% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 106.375 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.125 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0 5.23603664747 229% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196611955951 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0810257891566 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0627562630633 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133322399112 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0485878113167 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.