Most people think that the truth should be objective rather than subjective when it comes to the news.
There is no doubt that media plays a key role in the entire world. It assists us to know what is happening in throughout the world. The majority of people feel that truth should be impartial instead of personal which comes through the news. This easy will highlight what are reasons behind this and some potential measures to resolve it.
To embark upon, there are two reasons why news which are published by media, are subjective. The mammoth recognisable fact is that in order to get TRP. There are some news channels which telecast news as subjective since they do not care the reality of news. They focus how to attain much publicity by news. In addition, some news channels which work under the politicians leaders as with the help of such media, politicians attract the masses towards own their to enhance their vote bank. For example, as per a recent survey which has been carried out in india where about 70% news channels telecast fake news to promote their channel and to make adequate co-ordinate with leaders.
However, some solutions can be adopted to improve the situation. It could be done by information campaign to make aware people about the corrupt news channels. Since fake media highlight news to spread violent in the society, it should be banned by government so that people can able to know reliable news. The majority of people depend upon newspaper to access information about the world. Therefore, journalists need to publish accurate news which will be proved beneficial for the society.
To sum up, it is due to the media that people receive valuable information. Thus, journalists must understand their duties as a lot of people who rely on them to know truth.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 568, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hich has been carried out in india where about 70% news channels telecast fake ne...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, so, therefore, thus, for example, in addition, no doubt, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1416.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88275862069 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47934631406 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.565517241379 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 431.1 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.5830343581 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.2941176471 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0588235294 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.41176470588 7.06120827912 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233177894002 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0755320918251 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0774613105535 0.0667982634062 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138662935775 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0431932557897 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.0946893788 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.