Some people say that government should spend money on faster public transport. Other think that money should be spent on different aspects such as cost reduction and environment.
It is debatable issue whether money should be spent on public transport or other aspects. Most people reckon government needs to spend money on faster public transport, clamours are heard that money should be spent on different aspects ranging from cost reduction and environment. This easy intends to discuss both views, I however, gravitate towards former view.
To embark with the, the evidences are plenty to prove why money should be spent on public transport modes by government. The mammoth recognisable fact is that if money spend on public transport, it helps to reduce several obstacles which relate to traffic issues such as people use personal vehicle instead of public transport as public transport are not comfortable as well as it takes a lots of time to reach its destination. Additionally, the another factor is linked to the environment problems. More vehicles use mean more pollution. Since public transport is a crucial part of nation, and it assists to figure out many problems, government should spend money on faster public transport.
However, there are some masses who recommend that usage of money should be spent on environment and cost reduction. Firstly, government have to focus on cost reduction. Owing to the expensive public transport modes, people tend to use personal vehicles. In order to encourage to the people towards the public transport, government have to pay more attention on cost reduction. Air pollution is burgeoning relentless due to huge number of vehicles. Moreover, with the help of technology, these issues could be mitigated. Electrical transport mode is appropriate way, which is quite ecofriendly and much comfortable in spite of other modes. Thus, government needs to adopt such transport modes which could be operate without hurting the natural world.
To sum up, albeit people tend to prefer faster transport modes, money should be spent on innovation innovative transport mode which will be prove beneficial in the future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 16, Rule ID: THE_PUNCT[1]
Message: Did you forget something after 'the'?
...wards former view. To embark with the, the evidences are plenty to prove why m...
^^^^
Line 5, column 388, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a lot' or simply 'lots'?
Suggestion: a lot; lots
...are not comfortable as well as it takes a lots of time to reach its destination. Addit...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, thus, well, such as, as well as, in spite of, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1687.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33860759494 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74968316189 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.525316455696 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 509.4 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.9829756736 49.4020404114 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.2352941176 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5882352941 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.76470588235 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.547633460151 0.244688304435 224% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.169369382385 0.084324248473 201% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.162005604116 0.0667982634062 243% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.366459396462 0.151304729494 242% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117754892668 0.056905535591 207% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.