In Many countries, mainly tourists but not local people, visit museum and historical sites. Why does this happen and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places.
It is undeniable fact that often overseas tourists visit museums and historical sites instead of local people. It can be done by some certain solutions. This easy intends to know what are the reasons behind the causes of this phenomenon and what should be do to crub this issue and my personal view this matter.
To embark with, the evidences are plenty to prove why local people don't like to visit these places. The mammoth recognisable fact is that since local inhabitants are too much familiar with local museums and others heritage place, they getting bored when they visit such places. Exploring new information or arts object is essential part of life. If such places are not changed with new art objects or other innovative technology, there will be nothing to see and know for local people. Furthermore, there are some reasons which create hinders to go these places for local people. It is due to the paid entry that in some places where people have to pay money to visit. It could be expensive as per a middle class person. Thereby, they found that it can be wastage of money for them.
However, there are some initiatives which may prove beneficial to figure out these issues. On the top, government plays a significant role in it. Government needs to make more attractive museums and galleries such as established more attractive art objects which will attract to the local masses as well as tourists. Moreover, these places should be free of charge. Owing to the free entrance, these places will more people attract, and local people and tourists more likely to explore new things in which they are interested. To illustrate, sanik public school which is located in kapurthala city, is attracting more local people and overseas tourism due to their new arts object and free entry.
To sum up, albeit local people lost their interest to visit these places on account of some reasons, it could be done by retaining some effective way which may solve these obstacles.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 257, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'done'?
Suggestion: done
...s of this phenomenon and what should be do to crub this issue and my personal view...
^^
Line 3, column 68, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...es are plenty to prove why local people dont like to visit these places. The mammoth...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, well, as to, such as, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1648.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 339.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86135693215 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41353824369 2.80592935109 86% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522123893805 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 521.1 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.953272 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.5555555556 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8333333333 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88888888889 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.409732992991 0.244688304435 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122602187649 0.084324248473 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0804942533292 0.0667982634062 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.248988011477 0.151304729494 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0478972021789 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.