Music should not be taught in schools. Instead, other subjects such as computers and science should be taught. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Many people believe that computers and science should be taught instead of music. Personally, I would like to agree with this statement and the reasons will be discussed below.
To begin with, both computers and science are very essential subjects. In fact, the future will probably revolve around these two fields. To illustrate this, many people predict that robots will substitute humans in the future. Meanwhile, science plays a huge role in the field of computer science. For example, the subject called bioinformatics definitely needs its learners to study biology alongside with computer science. Additionally, these disciplines are both highly demanded. It is a well-known fact that a majority of high school graduates choose to major in either science-related fields or computer science simply because there are a lot of job opportunities available. Some advocates also argue that people who study science or computers can play a huge role in contributing to education and humanity. For instance, those graduates can become professors and researchers, who have the ability to solve complex real-world problems.
On the other hand, of course, some people will say that music is equally significant. While this can be true, its demand in a few years is questionable. In the first place, by using artificial intelligence and machine learning, machines will be able to play musical instruments with an absolutely considerable quality.
In conclusion, I would definitely support those people who think that computers and science are more relevant than music is, which leads to the belief that these two STEM-related subjects should be taught instead of music.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, of course, to begin with, in the first place, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1414.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41762452107 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92067636103 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.605363984674 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.0149183639 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.2666666667 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.340062446993 0.244688304435 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108265981939 0.084324248473 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118110434331 0.0667982634062 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.25472752472 0.151304729494 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.141488972156 0.056905535591 249% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.86 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.