New technologies have changed the way children spend their free time. Do advantages of this outweigh disadvantages?
It is often argued that the ways youngsters waste their spare time are replaced by new machinery. In my opinion, these devices do more harm than good to children.
On the one hand, new electronic devices connected to the Internet have brought certain values to teenagers. Firstly, they satisfy children of different preferences for entertainments in leisure time such as: video games, games after a hard working day at school. Secondly, adolescents are more likely to gain some basic skills and knowledge which play a fundamental role in their future jobs after playing these games. For example, fast reflexes can be horned by playing 2468-a puzzle-solving game. Also, vocabularies as well as memory can be enhanced through Word Links.
On the other hand, I strongly believe that the cons of availability of modern technological devices are more worrying compared to the pros for a variety of reasons. It cannot be denied that children stand higher chances of developing and leading a sedentary and passive lifestyle as modern technologies are addictive. Furthermore, exposure to technology can lead to deterioration in health. For instance, a student may suffer from short-sighted due to spending too much time on surfing the Web, playing games and browsing the apps such as Facebook, Instagram. Finally, using these devices can result in some dangerous problems. To illustrate, these virtual relationships on games can lead to private violation or cyberbullying.
In conclusion, I think that the disadvantages of new modern technologies that teenagers often use in their leisure time far outweigh their advantages.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, second, secondly, so, well, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, such as, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1369.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36862745098 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04883739447 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.643137254902 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 426.6 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.1525014188 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.7857142857 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2142857143 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.2142857143 7.06120827912 187% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218394511561 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0672880057682 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.075709516631 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16060299616 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0850456134409 0.056905535591 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.