In recent years, there has been considerable discussion about how to expand social circles. With the exponential growth of the social network, an increasing number of people prefer online interaction rather than face to face. This is a negative development that can lead to cyber fraud despite some additional advantages.
Admittedly, online socialization has some benefits, for it is an efficient tool for people to communicate with each other without having physical contact. Recently, the pandemic has kept people from going outside, so it is hard to meet with each other physically. For example, my school is not allowed to have lectures in-class to avoid physical contact because of the pandemic. Thus, we move everything into a place called "team" and have classes through live videos. However, this does not necessarily imply that every form of communication can be replaced by online communication.
One serious problem arising from people socializing online is that it contributes to cyber fraud, which has become one of the most severe crimes since social media. There is evidence that many people have been deceived by online fraudsters claiming to make friends, with more than 1000 dollars lost in each case. For instance, a couple of months ago, the police in the US had just cracked down on a fraudulent team. This illegal team hired female employees to socialize with some lonely people in famous social applications while accessing those victims' IP addresses and personal information. Unwary of the pitfalls behind the cyber world, the victims not only poured out their hearts to the online liars but also disclosed the details of their credit card numbers and bank accounts. These gullible people did not develop any long-term relationship; instead, the only thing they got from online socialization was a waste of time and money.
In conclusion, the negative impacts of online interaction far outweigh the benefits it can bring to people. Although it has become more popular for people to socialize through the internet, it has brought about too many problems for this to be considered a positive trend. Hence, people should be cautious about interacting with others on the internet.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, so, thus, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1860.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 355.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23943661972 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77383129472 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611267605634 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 587.7 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.6523048249 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.411764706 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8823529412 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.94117647059 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282426894569 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0809903405157 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0830336001817 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177903080841 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0924258922399 0.056905535591 162% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.