Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products. Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals suffer, while others are in favor of them because of their benefits to humanity.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
It is true that medicines are tested on animals before they are clear for human use for a long history. However, people hold different views toward this issue. The opponents believe that such experiments should be prohibited, while others claim that animal testing is still necessary. Personally speaking, I think animal testing should not be banned in the current era.
On one hand, there are ethical arguments against animal testing. For example, the laboratory mice used in testing would be given an illness in order to measure the effectiveness of a new drug. These mice could be suffering from pain or even dead because of such experiments. Opponents of animal testing argue that all the creatures on the earth are equally and should be respected, human have no right to cause such pain to animals just for the search of medicine for humans. They believe that the benefits of research using animals do not justify the suffering caused. .
However, I will explain why animal testing should be existed. Firstly, animal experiments are still the most reliable way to test the safety of new drugs. Indeed, scientists could try to develop alternatives to animal experiments, but it would cost a vast amount of money and time, which would be better to spent on medicine researches. Secondly, some animals have strong breeding, which means there is little impact on their existence even they are being used for animal testing. Furthermore, if all the animal experiments are banned, we cannot guarantee if there are any serious side-effects of new drug, which might put patients in danger.
In conclusion, it would be wrong to completely ban animal testing for medical research until reliable alternative methods have been developed.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 571, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ls do not justify the suffering caused. . However, I will explain why animal t...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, while, for example, i think, in conclusion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1457.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13028169014 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63103152201 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.580985915493 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.0603710569 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.1333333333 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9333333333 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.409565114958 0.244688304435 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139703923526 0.084324248473 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0631448873389 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.24622393936 0.151304729494 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0683767556999 0.056905535591 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.