Nowadays celebrities earn more money than politicians What are the reasons for this Is it a positive or negative development

Essay topics:

Nowadays celebrities earn more money than politicians. What are the reasons for this? Is it a positive or negative development?

In this days celebrities make most money than compared with the who work in politicians. I will give in this essay positive and negative for development.
There are two reasons why celebrities make money better than politicians. Firstly celebrities could earn money on Social media which is popular nowadays, for example: You tube, Instagram, Telegram and others, in this programs everyone can earn most money. On the other hand celebrities might be make money who open online shopping, in my view this job high demand, while nowadays danger situation because coronavirus is increased in this way online shopping is popular.
I personally believe that this development is relatively negative for several reasons between celebrities and politicians for example politics are safe heath different people who have who needs help money, food, clothes in this way politics helps to people but celebrities thinks only your lifestyle rarely help other people o definitely can say politicians more useful than celebrities, but this way is not so much paid work. This is particularly not good for politics; other people may create crime and other social problems.
In conclusion in fact celebrities is leader and more paid work than compared with politicians. On the other hand politicians is effective to people but not so much paid work. I believe this is a negative trend which may lead to more celebrities corruption and less talented

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 4, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
In this days celebrities make most money than c...
^^^^
Line 4, column 233, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'celebrities'' or 'celebrity's'?
Suggestion: celebrities'; celebrity's
...a negative trend which may lead to more celebrities corruption and less talented
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, may, so, while, for example, in conclusion, in fact, in my view, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 41.998997996 43% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1202.0 1615.20841683 74% => OK
No of words: 230.0 315.596192385 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22608695652 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79502663906 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 176.041082164 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552173913043 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 384.3 506.74238477 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 105.33299578 49.4020404114 213% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 120.2 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7 7.06120827912 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.452592641766 0.244688304435 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.174035240111 0.084324248473 206% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0725034489833 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.273528642167 0.151304729494 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0378976275305 0.056905535591 67% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 78.4519038076 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.