Nowadays consumer goods have become the most important part of people’s lives.
Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?
Consumer durables tended to be more common, but there has been a massive increase in the importance of consumer goods in people’s lives. This new way of living clearly is a mixed blessing.
There are a plenty of options available for people to choose from. This is one of the most, if not the most, beneficial aspect of consumerism. In the past people used to choose between at most two brands of a product that they had an intention to buy. Nowadays, provided one wants to buy a cheese, which is one of the most straightforward needs of human, has several options to choose, from the manufacturer to the type of cheese. Having mentioned the vast range of options, with the emerge of globalism, consumerism has expanded and people can buy items from all over the world. This also has led to more range of options for buyers.
Considering the wide range of choices that consumerism provides, it does have setbacks. Many consumers buy produces that they do not even need, this is a result of marketing and misleading advertisements that is incredibly common in our lives. Another setback for this is that the purchasing power of people has decreased steeply, in that people follow consumerism in an adverse way and excessively buy items that is promoted by media. A shining example is how consumers buy a brand new Iphone when their old Iphone is working just fine. This can really make trouble in their budget planning.
Taking all these points into account, it can clearly be seen that, although people have more options to buy, it certainly reduce their power of purchasing and resulted in misleading adverts.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 481, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ntioned the vast range of options, with the emerge of globalism, consumerism has expanded ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 366, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an adverse way" with adverb for "adverse"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...eply, in that people follow consumerism in an adverse way and excessively buy items that is promo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 123, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'reduces'?
Suggestion: reduces
... have more options to buy, it certainly reduce their power of purchasing and resulted ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, really, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1347.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84532374101 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69566578917 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.553956834532 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 416.7 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.2098148792 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.2142857143 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8571428571 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.78571428571 7.06120827912 25% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238732765587 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0816069486566 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0650384934488 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149773836265 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0747933276735 0.056905535591 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.