Nowadays environmental problems are too big to be managed by individual persons. In other words, it is a governmental problem. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Environmental situation has been a highly debatable topic for decades. Some people believe that current issues become to huge to be addressed without participation of elected officials. I strongly agree with this opinion since preservation of nature is expensive for individuals as well as not profitable for them.
Conservation of environment is a complicated process that require not only keeping the amount of incoming toxins steady but also discarding pollutants that are already in water, soil and air, which costs exorbitantly for personal implementation. Therefore, government can be considered as the unique source of finances for Earth cleaning. On top of that, most of the specific machinery for hazardous waste recycling is owned by public authorities. For example, according to recent studies of Moscow State University, the reduction of greenhouse effect in eastern part of Russia would cost approximately one third of the GDP, which makes it affordable only for state budget. In other words, only legislators possess enough resources to handle global worming.
In addition to the above-mentioned issue, preservation of environment is not beneficial for manufacturers since the decrease in emissions increases production expenses making products less competetive on a market. Hence, only senators are able to enforce production lines modification in favour of nature conservation. For instance, the limits on vehicles’ emissions have reduced air polution in Germany for eighty percent. Thus, legislation is a valuable tool that is held by national leaders in managing environmental situation.
In conclusion, I undoubtely believe that only governments possess enough finantial and influential resources to reduce nature polution in modern societies.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, therefore, third, thus, well, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, in other words, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1513.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.7969348659 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25588901205 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.670498084291 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.9973641111 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.384615385 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0769230769 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.7692307692 7.06120827912 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0569697825909 0.244688304435 23% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0229364514582 0.084324248473 27% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0244067656444 0.0667982634062 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0332883461031 0.151304729494 22% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0262146182575 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 50.2224549098 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.36 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.8 8.58950901804 126% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.