Nowadays, international tourism is the biggest industry in the world. Unfortunately, international tourism creates tension rather than understanding between different cultures. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In recent years, the human civilization has briskly modified to a brand-new era accompanying with the unparalleled pervasiveness of no-geographical boundaries tourism as a multibillion dollars industry. It is commonly asserted that this phenomenon mirrors the global integration and growing liquid assets. The bulk of general public, thus, persistently spark off heated controversies as to whether this term of business would impair the globe. In this essay, a closed inspection would reveal how fallacious they are.
To open the deliberation, an unprecedented surge in the long-distance journeys is seemingly a momentum regarding both individuals and society as a whole. On a minor level, such a massive amount of take-home payment that the tendency to cling to the frugal lifestyle is no longer the case. It means that inhabitants are prompt to flock to tourist traps named promised lands. On a macro level, an inordinate number of economies have seen a bright future by harnessing the prospective features of landscapes, rituals demands. From then on, a synergy of ever-seen occupations has been implemented to bridge an inevitable gap between rich and poor. Obviously, this might give a significant boost to the international socioeconomic status.
Notwithstanding that appealing profitability, that is not to say that the thriving-vacation industry does not have its own setbacks owing to the environmental deterioration and cultural assimilation. It is irrefutable that almost nations are put on the verge of being submerged in amenity wastages and depreciation. This is how the culture and environment get ruined, at the expense of peak holiday-makers. Likewise, mass tourism has turned our globe into a melting pot since more and more people are manipulated by multiculturalism and homogeneity. Ultimately, the valid thousand-year tradition seems to be similar in any large metropolis.
To recapitulate, though the free flow of the most fuel-hungry vehicle to every corner of the world might be somewhat detrimental in terms of environment and costume, it also lucrative to indigenous regions vice versa. Hence, the government should be the first body to take initiatives and invest in fund toward a series of management to reap all its advantages.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 319, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
... and growing liquid assets. The bulk of general public, thus, persistently spark off heated co...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 385, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
...istently spark off heated controversies as to whether this term of business would impair the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, if, likewise, regarding, so, then, thus, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1911.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 349.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47564469914 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.45277080896 2.80592935109 123% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 176.041082164 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.661891117479 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 614.7 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.1287366275 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.411764706 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5294117647 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.88235294118 7.06120827912 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0693354956747 0.244688304435 28% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0169878883322 0.084324248473 20% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0227080662909 0.0667982634062 34% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0338929085974 0.151304729494 22% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0176885025334 0.056905535591 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.33 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 78.4519038076 161% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.