Nowadays, a lot of young people choose to live together under the same roof without officially getting married. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
It is comprehensible that people nowadays are no longer perpetuate the traditional lifestyle as their older generations, there is a global phenomenon that people live together before marriage is gaining popularity nationwide. I wholly believe that the benefits outperform the drawbacks in this situation.
On the one hand, there are some prime reasons why the cohabiting relationship can leads to a host of detrimental effects to mankind. First of all, based on the lack of teenager’s cognitive ability, they will be at risk such as unintended pregnancy. According to the analysis of many experts, they proved that the abortion rate increased exponentially compared to previous years. Secondly, if the cohabitants are not responsible for taking care of their families, at least economically, it will lead to an unsustainable relationship in the near future. Vietnam perfectly exemplifies this situation, because the majority of young people often depend on the allowance from their parents. As a result, living together under the same root need to be considered carefully.
Turning to the other side of this argument, although the aforementioned topic comprises a dark side in some aspects, the cohabiting relationship still bring an outstanding contribution to people’s life. They have a chance to find out the harmony between their souls. Therefore, it will pave the way for the sake of the sustainable relationship. Additionally, the fact proved that many couples think that they have found their true love until they get married, there is no doubt that they have to keep their eyes on many unforeseen problems. For instance, in western countries, people are free to live together before marriage in order to make important decisions after that.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that the advantages surpass the disadvantages of the cohabitation but people should also broaden their horizon and find some optimal solutions to avoid numerous issue in this circumstance.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 83, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'lead'
Suggestion: lead
...ons why the cohabiting relationship can leads to a host of detrimental effects to man...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, at least, for instance, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1683.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44660194175 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15542444497 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611650485437 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 533.7 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.7224537863 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.214285714 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0714285714 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3571428571 7.06120827912 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134096938862 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0429141527802 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0544058005128 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0824580633141 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00844987445258 0.056905535591 15% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.