Task 2: The increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment. What are the causes of this? What can be done to solve this problem?
It is widely acknowledged that natural environment in many parts of the world suffers from various detrimental effects which is attributed to human activities especially the mass production of goods. Personally, I wholly believe that both the government and corporations have to figure out some optimal solutions to cope with this debatable issue together.
There are two prime reasons why the growth of the consumer goods industry is related to environmental degradation. First of all, the expansion of industrial regions which leads to the indiscriminate deforestation has become a controversial issue in many developing countries nowadays. A considerable amount of natural habitats is destroyed, thereby making wildlife animals frustrated. Secondly, these factories will release a significant amount of emissions and waste into atmosphere and it can exert an adverse influence on environment. For example, in Beijing the development of industrial zones has facilitated the vigorous growth of social economy but it contributes to the recession of human environment such as air pollution, climate change and so on. Consequently, because of bad effects of production, many local people have to migrate to other countries.
Several viable solution have to be implemented to mitigate the aforementioned issues. The local authorities may impose a strict tax on the amount of waste from the production process in each enterprise. There is no doubt that this measure can make an outstanding contribution to the improvement of natural environment. Furthermore, companies should have awareness and responsibility for environmental protection. For instant, they may integrate cutting-edge technologies into waste treatment before discharging into the environment.
In conclusion, the production of consumer goods can pose a serious threat to natural ecosystem by large amount of waste from post-production process and deforestation. I believe that people should create more modern inventions to deal with this problem.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, furthermore, if, may, second, secondly, so, for example, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.3376753507 264% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1726.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.81144781145 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.3854645405 2.80592935109 121% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612794612795 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 551.7 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.3416520347 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.066666667 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.6 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187973357712 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.058708575979 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0548326642177 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120250980984 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.057067615049 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.81 50.2224549098 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.42 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.0 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.