In many cities, there is little control on the design and construction of new houses. Some people think that people can choose to build houses in their own styles instead of building them with the same as the old house style in local areas. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
The diversity of several types of house in areas make an outstanding contribution to many cultures as a marked milestone due to globalization. Although it is a remarkable revolution which alter traditional style of houses, I strongly believe that it also contains both pros and cons whilst the benefits outperform the drawbacks.
On the on hand, there is a dark side to this picture which may brings detrimental effects to local areas. First of all, when people adapt to new house’s styles, they tend to alter old houses on modern constructions. As a result, many things which belong to cultural identity of indigenous residents will be obsoleted. For instance, if old-fashioned houses are converted into new building or apartments, their children will not comprehend the traditional values of older generations. Secondly, in spite of the fact that modern constructions bring huge profits to local people, it may pose a threat to environment. According to experts, skyscrapers are the key reason that leads to greenhouse effect.
Turning to the sunny side of the argument, base on the burgeoning of house’s designs, people have a chance to expose to the progress around the world. Therefore, they are able to find out the harmony between their ideas and new ideas. Take technology advances as a shining example, people may apply it to their house and it will make their life more convenient. On top of that, by the way people can balance their own cultures and the new one together, it will support them to not runout of date. For example, if local residents make use of all experiences in the world to build their house, they will not waste their time and money.
In a nutshell, it is true that people may be overwhelmed by different type of structures and they will lose many traditional cultures because of overuse. However, I totally believe that the advantages outweigh the disadvantages due to its great benefits.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, for instance, as a result, by the way, first of all, in spite of, it is true, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1617.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02173913043 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92818937985 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577639751553 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.6446427025 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 107.8 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4666666667 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6 7.06120827912 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27366106894 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0787880178247 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0551975012488 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138598217711 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.070086379257 0.056905535591 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.