Nowadays many people prefer to use their own cars to commute rather than buses and trains. Why do you think this is happening? What can the government do to change it?
The trend of commuting through private vehicles is gaining ground in this modern era. Presently, few masses ponder that some individuals opt for a private vehicle in going to particular place instead of choosing bus or train. Here, I would like to discuss its causes as well as measures.
To begin with, private cars offer numerous advantages to commuters. To illustrate, a person who owns a car not only can plan destination but also utilize time while he travels. Hence, reliance over cars can reward someone freedom to travel. Moreover, people find private transportation is more reliable and faster way to travel which is lucrative in this fast moving era.
Furthermore, personal cars provide comfort while travelling on the contrary to the public buses which are so crowded and disgusting. Finally, personal cars are convenient mode of transportation with comfortable seats and superior features.
Numerous measures can be taken to solve this phenomenon. Firstly, government should decrease the fares of public transportation. Therefore, this will draw people attention to public transport such as buses or trains. What is more, buses and trains should be kept spike and spin and managed in such a way that will attract people.
To recapitulate, it is indeed true that personal cars offer flexible travel, freedom and quick access but I do believe that public transportation are far more better than private transportation in term of connivance incurred expenses of the travelling.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 213, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to bus'
Suggestion: to bus
...to particular place instead of choosing bus or train. Here, I would like to discuss...
^^^
Line 9, column 155, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'better' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: better
...ieve that public transportation are far more better than private transportation in term of ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 254, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ce incurred expenses of the travelling.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, such as, as well as, on the contrary, to begin with, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1264.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 237.0 315.596192385 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33333333333 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91460716539 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.654008438819 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 388.8 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.9919297811 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.2857142857 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9285714286 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3571428571 7.06120827912 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175357897849 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0562524758147 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0342602851316 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0849912742218 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0380473723624 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.