Nowadays men's sports are given far more attention by society compared to women's sports.what are the reasons for that?Do you think is a positive or a negative development?

Sports are widely seen in all parts of the world. However, most of the audience’s attention is devoted to men’s sports and relatively little is given to women’s sports. I think this is partly due to the patriarchal nature of our society and partly due to better marketing of the former.

Most human societies are male-dominated and, due to this, everyone loves watching men playing games. People prefer women as cheerleaders, commentators, hosts and audience in a game. However, they are not welcomed to play sports due to inherent bias for viewing males as sportspersons. Moreover, there are strong marketing campaigns run for men’s sports and the budget for female sports is relatively negligible. The Indian Premier League, which is a cricket match series for male players, received a marketing budget of more than 100 million in 2017. Women’s cricket team that won the world cup for India, on the other hand, went unnoticed as no marketing campaign was run to celebrate its achievement.

In think, this is a negative development since it makes women subordinate to men. They are expected to work for men and not compete with them. This attitude celebrates women as wives of famous players but they are not expected to achieve anything. Thus, the gender gap in a society is widened. Moreover, not giving equal value to women sports is economically harmful to a country. Women sports are a source of motivation for other women who perform non-sports activities. When a women’s team gains recognition, all women feel that they can achieve more. This improves the economic output of a country and makes it more prosperous.

In conclusion, women sports should be given the same importance that men’s sports get. This is important to reduce the gender gap. This will make a society socially stable and economically prosperous.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, moreover, so, thus, as for, i think, in conclusion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1566.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16831683168 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92366027992 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554455445545 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 483.3 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.7868072395 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.3 106.682146367 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.15 20.7667163134 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.15 7.06120827912 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.352505306964 0.244688304435 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104269940348 0.084324248473 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0924146514756 0.0667982634062 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225249152439 0.151304729494 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0429053304088 0.056905535591 75% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.0946893788 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.11 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.