Nowadays more tasks at home and work are being performed by robots. Why do you think it is happening? It is negative or positive development.
"It has become appallingly obvious that technology has exceeded humans". With the rise in mordernisation a man has transformed tremendouly from walking bare footed to taking first step on moon. This topic asserts that, are jobs performed by machines, negative or positive development? I will examine the dimensions of this topic throughly with examples and assertions and shape up my opinion by the end.
Nowadays, robots has made life easier. Robots are being used at work places for many reasons. As, they are accurate and fast which bolstered their demand. Take, for example, companies which produces various things which are in great public demand. They prefer machine to humans. Because a human being may get tired which results in delay. Whereas, machines are programed to perform specific task in fixed time only. Hence, robots provides more benefits rather than humans.
In addition to this, robots are being used in homes as well, where most of the people use them as status symbol. Since, everyone can not afford robots therefore only rich people buy them to show off there class in society. They use robot maids, which minimises the efforts and time in house hold chores. A survey was conducted in India which reveals that 98 percent of people who have robots at their houses use them only to show off their status in society.
It is evident from the given topic that machines are of great use but like every coin has two sides, mavhines also ha e disadvatages as well.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 280, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... demand. They prefer machine to humans. Because a human being may get tired which resul...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 340, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...g may get tired which results in delay. Whereas, machines are programed to perform spec...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, may, so, therefore, well, whereas, for example, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1249.0 1615.20841683 77% => OK
No of words: 251.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97609561753 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42719417582 2.80592935109 87% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.669322709163 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 395.1 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.3016337238 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 73.4705882353 106.682146367 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.7647058824 20.7667163134 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.17647058824 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0966012119021 0.244688304435 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0318089726375 0.084324248473 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0465242068644 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0469677779618 0.151304729494 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0358878093979 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.0946893788 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 50.2224549098 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.3001002004 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.01 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.