Wasting food is a daily matter all arcoss the globe. There are several reason for wasting food and some countermasure should be taken to cut it off.
To beging with, the foremost cause of wasting meal is that purchasing too much food beyond one's need. When people buy foods they preffer to purchase some extra food to make sure that if they feel hungry they will have extra food to eat. For example, one of my collegues eat a burger in lunch but when he buy burgers he would like to have one more so that if he feel hungry after a havy work he will not have to purchase again. Consequently, the rest food was at risk to be wasted and so many time is happens.
Furthermore, meals are being ruined while is time for a party or any program. When one arrenge a programme, he have to astimate the number of guest he invited and, based on his perception he have to prepare food and take some extra food for not having shortege if there is ureasonable guests arrive. Lets consider, someone invited 300 people in a marrige ceremony and he prepared food for 350 persons. In almost all program there is less chance to have unpredictable guests and for this reason, the extra food that has been cooked for in case will loss.
To control the wastage of food we much have to aware while buying food. We should not purchase any extra food for later. Thus, the food waste will be reduced. The second means which can be taken is that distibute extra food to any orphanage or any charity so that they can eat the rest of the food.
In conclusion, the main cause of food wastege is ourchaising too much food, and cooking extra food in any programme. We should not buy any more food beyod our need, and give the rest foods to any charity or any orphanege organisation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 64, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun reason seems to be countable; consider using: 'several reasons'.
Suggestion: several reasons
... matter all arcoss the globe. There are several reason for wasting food and some countermasure...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 305, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'buys'.
Suggestion: buys
...egues eat a burger in lunch but when he buy burgers he would like to have one more ...
^^^
Line 3, column 362, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'feels'.
Suggestion: feels
...uld like to have one more so that if he feel hungry after a havy work he will not ha...
^^^^
Line 3, column 488, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun time seems to be countable; consider using: 'many times'.
Suggestion: many times
...st food was at risk to be wasted and so many time is happens. Furthermore, meals are b...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 112, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
...ogram. When one arrenge a programme, he have to astimate the number of guest he invi...
^^^^
Line 5, column 192, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
...invited and, based on his perception he have to prepare food and take some extra foo...
^^^^
Line 5, column 301, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
... if there is ureasonable guests arrive. Lets consider, someone invited 300 people in...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, furthermore, if, second, so, thus, while, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1436.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.40490797546 5.12529762239 86% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.26788997254 2.80592935109 81% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.493865030675 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 457.2 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.7748334185 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.75 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.375 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4375 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291035309363 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139185104851 0.084324248473 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0697367925883 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205467600691 0.151304729494 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0537086958887 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.0946893788 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 50.2224549098 136% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.24 12.4159519038 66% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.2 8.58950901804 84% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 78.4519038076 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.